Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -ProfitZone
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-07 16:27:46
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Missouri to cut income tax rate in 2025, marking fourth straight year of reductions
- Report: U.S. Olympic swimmers David Johnston, Luke Whitlock test positive for COVID-19
- What's on board Atlas V? ULA rocket launches on classified Space Force mission
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- The best 3-row SUVs with captain's seats that command comfort
- USA men's 4x200 relay races to silver to cap night of 4 medals
- Relatives sue for prison video after guards charged in Black Missouri man’s death
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Another Chinese Olympic doping scandal hurts swimmers who play by the rules
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Texas radio host’s friend sentenced to life for her role in bilking listeners of millions
- Christina Applegate opens up about the 'only plastic surgery I’ve ever had'
- Two sets of US rowers qualify for finals as lightweight pairs falls off
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- DJ Moore signs 4-year, $110 million extension with Chicago Bears
- Democrats look to longtime state Sen. Cleo Fields to flip Louisiana congressional seat blue
- 'Tortillas save lives': Watch Texas family save orphaned baby bird named Taquito
Recommendation
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
South Sudan men's basketball beats odds to inspire at Olympics
USA Basketball vs. South Sudan live updates: Time, TV and more from Paris Olympics
USA Basketball vs. South Sudan live updates: Time, TV and more from Paris Olympics
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Kentucky judge dismisses lawsuit challenging a new law to restrict the sale of vaping products
US suspends $95 million in aid to Georgia after passage of foreign agent law that sparked protests
4 Suspects Arrested and Charged With Murder in Shooting Death of Rapper Julio Foolio